This is default featured post 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured post 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

Showing posts with label Summer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Summer. Show all posts

Monday, August 15, 2011

Kate Middleton’s Jeans & Favorite Summer Reality Shows

Who saw what movie(s) this weekend? Who knew Rise of the Planet of the Apes would again triumph at the box office? We saw that one coming. What we didn’t see is just how popular The Help would be, bringing in $25 million bucks. That’s a ton of cash for for a little movie that was not expected to triumph and frankly, that’s been kind of poorly marketed. Maybe poorly‘s a strong word – they basically tried to lure everyone in who liked the book with a simple, almost hokey chick-flick-y poster. Which is shrewd to a degree (because you always play to your strongest audience), but perhaps they should have had more confidence. The movie is a LOT bigger than the poster, and this weekend many pals saw The Help and are offering up all manner of reviews – which range, by and large, from “good” to “amazing” – which is, in my opinion, right on the money. Nor, by the way, am I getting any sort of cut for my emphatic recommendation. In Los Angeles when I’m at a party and I meet someone who’s all over this TV show or that film I say to myself hmmm – what’s at stake here …what’s their connection? It’s a natural instinct because we live in an era where everyone’s tied to something. Only in this case, I have no agenda or connection other than the fact that it’s a great film. I’m really impressed with what I saw, doubly so because seeing the trailer I thought gee, that looks boring. Boy was I wrong. So that’s my genuine opinion. I’m not on anyone’s payroll. Which might not be something you’d say about the following news headline:

Kate Middleton Wears J Brand Jeans Three Days in a Row

Did you catch this story in your Daily Newlywed Royal Update? If you ask me, there’s definitely something afoot here with Kate and Those Jeans. For two reasons. One, did she wear them because she could only fit one pair of  jeans into her suitcase while she was traveling? No. Pretty sure she has more than just the wheelie carry-on bag. Particularly since she’s  wearing them on jaunts from home too. And two: when you’re the Duchess of Cambridge and your clothing is scrutinized daily, you know that what you wear is duly recorded by every media outlet (including this one). We read about it, we see a picture, and soon enough everyone wants to purchase it (I have at least two friends who are delighted to sport both Kate & Pippa’s handbags, which were sold out by the time I tried.)

The truth of the matter is this: the great fashion irony among the very fabulous is that the more famous you are (and frequently richer so you could conceivably afford whatever) the more stuff is given to you. Just like that. Totally free. Because designers know that despite spending thousands on advertising, there is nothing so valuable as a famous person snapped by paparazzi strolling into Starbucks in your togs. That’s gold, and that’s just how it works. If you make evening gowns? Forget it. One red carpet appearance can change your business forever.

When you’re at that level of the celebrity spectrum (is it even a level? Is it even a spectrum? Isn’t she at the top of the heap?) you’re beyond aware of the impression you make every time you walk out the front door of your apartment /palace/castle/fortress/island retreat. And if you’re a fashionista –  which she is  – you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that what and how many times you wear something is the stuff of media content. I’m not saying that she broke the J Brand CEO’s garage window playing ball as a child,  or that they have naughty photos of her in some vault, but wearing that pair of trou three days in a row? Not an accident at all. Let’s just hope they send her a giant fruit basket or something.

Today’s poll:

Voice your choice in today’s featured poll and tell us which of these summer reality shows is your favorite:

1)  Bachelor Pad 2

2)   Big Brother

3)   Hell’s Kitchen

4)   Project Runway


View the original article here

Monday, August 8, 2011

Summer TV…and Boycotted TV – Will You Tune In?

Today I’d like to talk about a great show, and another show that – regardless of whether it’s good or bad – probably ought to be given a chance. By viewers.

Even though summer isn’t necessarily filled with TV’s proudest moments (unless you’re managing Gene Simmons’ career), if you look hard enough there is some quality TV. Nor is the quality necessarily connected to TNT’s decision to purchase even more episodes of Franklin & Bash – which is vaguely ludicrous. But there’s quality TV that’s endured cancellations and then mysterious rebirths on strange (albeit cool) stations. I’m talking of course about Damages, which is indeed back and quite spectacularly so on DirecTV. It’s one of my all time favorite shows ever and in the same way that there are those who cannot get enough of Breaking Bad or The Good Wife or House, I’m an unrepentant Damages fan. For those of you unfamiliar with the show, it stars Glenn Close as an uber-ruthless lawyer and Rose Byrne (the ice queen from Bridesmaids) as Close’s one-time protégé and sometime rival. Each season they take a real story from the headlines and explore it from a legal angle – like the Bernie Madoff scandal. Currently we have John Goodman (at his very, very best – no question about a guest-star Emmy nod next year) playing a maybe corrupt former Marine-type who now runs a “private security” firm in Afghanistan (think Blackwater). If ever there was first-rate drama, this is it. Close (who’s won an Emmy for the role) is beyond miraculous and Rose Byrne nips gamely and deliciously at her heels. This latest season – while more violent than I’d like —  is nevertheless a real blockbuster. If you get a chance, try out Damages or watch one of the first three seasons on DVD. It’s what keenly intelligent thrillers are all about, and you may find yourself hooked – it’s that good. That smart and that well-acted.

Then there’s another show – one of NBC’s most heavily hyped – that’s already in a ton of hot water and it hasn’t even aired yet. Hunhh?

A few weeks back we talked about The Playboy Club. Now a local station in Utah refused to air it this fall on account of its “racy nature”. As you may recall the show stars Eddie Cibrian as a very suave Don Draper-type who’s kind of a “fixer” at Chicago’s Playboy Club in 1963. In the show he’s charged with keeping everything running smoothly when one of the Playboy Bunnies gets herself into a pickle and someone dies. Now – on top of the Utah NBC station —  we have an even bigger entity going after the show. The Parents Television Council has lodged a major complaint, arguing that The Playboy Club should be boycotted because it  “glamorizes porn” by putting a “veneer of sophistication on an industry that exploits women and destroys families…it is disgraceful.”  What do you think? Does this bug you or do you think these folks have a point? Will you boycott it? Here’s what I think. Obviously exploiting women is bad, in any way, shape, or form. No question about that. But if these associations and groups are going to band together on behalf of their children’s purity and impressionability, shouldn’t they be going after other shows first? Haven’t they got bigger, racier, far more inappropriate & gory fish to fry than a network period piece that may not even last two episodes?  How about all the other shows which feature porn stars – only these are the dismembered, dead porn stars who hunky cops discover in those insanely popular crime dramas — those are okay, right Parents TV Council? But we’re not allowed to watch the ones who lived forty-seven years ago? And what about The Bachelor and The Bachelorette – doesn’t that glamorize something unseemly?  Don’t even get me started on MTV – but that’s okay with all the parents’ groups?

I make this point all the time, and I feel strongly that a lot of TV is just bad for kids to watch because it gives them ideas and glamorizes just about everything. But to go after what is essentially an historical drama when we have heinous crimes depicted and horrific monsters and psychopaths wandering around on prime time feels kind of ridiculous. There’s an unfortunate double standard at play which may never change. But it seems to me that when these groups start targeting TV shows maybe they should target something that’s a) current and or b) worth the attack.  Now let’s talk about Damages.

Today’s poll:

The current season of Damages is in full swing. Voice your choice in today’s featured poll and tell us which of these Glenn Close vehicles is your favorite:

1) 101 Dalmations

2) Dangerous Liaisons

3) Fatal Attraction

4) Jagged Edge


View the original article here